It *could* be that those players were exaggerating, but consider the several hundred hours required for players to carefully document results and compile large data sets to demonstrate validity. I don't want these points getting lost, as happens sometimes.ġ) The large data sets reported from in-game by players show really bad odds, mathematically.

I'll repeat a couple comments here that I've made elsewhere. My impression is a lot of things are pretty well decided on, but if the community speaks up and says there are issues, then maybe something will be done about those issues. Way I figure it, 1942 Online is in Early Access. If it was thought that casual players not necessarily with any experience of Axis and Allies would be the best market (and my guess is that *would* be true), why put in features aimed at veteran / more serious players that would cost considerably more to develop? I mean sure, we could say game integrity, player satisfaction, but in the end the decision to develop the game or not was a business call.Īnd really, if all the features I want had made it into the game, I'm sure it would have taken double the budget - probably more, even a LOT more.

I don't like it, but it's not unreasonable. That probably means the program was designed and written in a certain way. I've written elsewhere I think the developers wanted to target a casual market. But even if they did, big businesses and governments get hacked all the time.įar as looking at data of past games - I don't know that Beamdog's got it set up that they can do that. Far as I know, Beamdog didn't have experience developing this type of game.

Kobold byrd.No particular reason developers in 2020 would be all over this.

Axis and allies game pc cheat engine